Paclitaxel

證據等級: L5 預測適應症: 10

目錄

  1. Paclitaxel
  2. Paclitaxel: From an Undocumented Original Indication to Female Breast Carcinoma
    1. One-Sentence Summary
    2. Quick Overview
    3. Why is This Prediction Reasonable?
    4. Clinical Trial Evidence
    5. Literature Evidence
    6. Cytotoxicity
    7. Safety Considerations
    8. Conclusion and Next Steps
    9. Disclaimer

## 藥師評估報告

Paclitaxel: From an Undocumented Original Indication to Female Breast Carcinoma

One-Sentence Summary

Paclitaxel's original approved indication is not captured in this evidence pack (Finland market status: not marketed, 0 authorizations on file), so it cannot be stated with certainty here. The TxGNN model predicts it may be effective for Female Breast Carcinoma, and this direction is already backed by 50 clinical trials and 20 publications in the evidence pack — reflecting the fact that paclitaxel is a globally established taxane chemotherapy already used in breast cancer regimens.

Quick Overview

Item Content
Original Indication Not documented in this evidence pack (data gap — DrugBank/TFDA records empty)
Predicted New Indication Female Breast Carcinoma
TxGNN Prediction Score 99.995% (rank #82)
Evidence Level L1
Finland Market Status ✗ Not Marketed
Number of Authorizations 0
Recommended Decision Proceed with Guardrails

Why is This Prediction Reasonable?

Currently, detailed mechanism-of-action data for paclitaxel is not available in this record (flagged as a High-severity data gap, DG002). Based on the repurposing rationale captured in the evidence pack, paclitaxel is a taxane-class microtubule-stabilizing agent: it inhibits spindle depolymerization, causing mitotic arrest and apoptosis in rapidly dividing cells. This mechanism is well validated clinically in high-proliferation tumors.

Female breast carcinoma is a classic high-mitotic-rate solid tumor, and this microtubule-stabilization mechanism is independent of hormone-receptor or HER2 status — which is consistent with paclitaxel already being one of the most extensively studied cytotoxic backbones in breast cancer regimens worldwide (both as monotherapy and combined with trastuzumab, lapatinib, or platinum agents).

Because original-indication data is missing from this specific record (and the drug shows as not marketed in Finland), this prediction functions less as a novel mechanistic leap and more as confirmation of an already-established global indication that happens to be absent from the local regulatory record on file.

Clinical Trial Evidence

Trial Number Phase Status Enrollment Key Findings
NCT00281658 Phase 3 Completed 444 Lapatinib + Paclitaxel vs. Placebo + Paclitaxel in ErbB2-amplified metastatic breast cancer
NCT01275677 Phase 3 Completed 3270 Chemotherapy (incl. weekly paclitaxel) ± trastuzumab in node-positive/high-risk HER2-low breast cancer
NCT00003088 Phase 3 Completed 2005 Sequential doxorubicin, paclitaxel, cyclophosphamide vs. concurrent AC→paclitaxel in node-positive stage II/IIIA breast cancer
NCT00431080 Phase 3 Completed 478 Dose-dense FE75C→docetaxel vs. paclitaxel as adjuvant therapy in node-positive breast cancer
NCT01901146 Phase 3 Completed 725 ABP 980 vs. trastuzumab (both with paclitaxel backbone context) in HER2-positive early breast cancer
NCT00513292 Phase 3 Completed 280 FEC-75→paclitaxel+trastuzumab vs. paclitaxel+trastuzumab→FEC-75 in HER2-positive operable breast cancer
NCT00016276 Phase 3 Terminated 396 AC±dexrazoxane followed by weekly paclitaxel±trastuzumab in HER2+ stage IIIA–IV breast cancer
NCT00003992 Phase 2 Completed 200 Paclitaxel + trastuzumab adjuvant therapy for HER2-overexpressing stage II/IIIA breast cancer
NCT00272987 Phase 3 Terminated 63 Paclitaxel + trastuzumab + lapatinib vs. + placebo in ErbB2-overexpressing metastatic breast cancer
NCT04753177 Phase 2/3 Unknown 120 Neoadjuvant combined hormone therapy in premenopausal ER+/HER2- locally advanced breast cancer

Literature Evidence

PMID Year Type Journal Key Findings
11147586 2000 Cohort Cancer Doxorubicin + paclitaxel efficacy/toxicity in metastatic breast cancer; importance of prior adjuvant anthracycline exposure
31783552 2019 Review Biomolecules Paclitaxel's mechanistic and clinical effects on breast cancer, including resistance mechanisms
9282422 1997 Review Drug and Therapeutics Bulletin Early review of paclitaxel and docetaxel efficacy in breast and ovarian cancer
15305399 2004 Randomized trial Cancer GONO trial: concomitant vs. sequential epirubicin + paclitaxel as first-line therapy in metastatic breast carcinoma
39317691 2024 Preclinical Chemical Biology & Drug Design Paclitaxel combination therapeutic potential against breast carcinoma with in vivo biomarker identification
39009452 2024 Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer Paclitaxel's effect on tumor-associated macrophages enhancing PD-1 blockade in TNBC
32461977 2020 BioMed Research International Real-world efficacy of neoadjuvant epirubicin/cyclophosphamide + weekly paclitaxel/trastuzumab in HER2+ breast carcinoma
24823476 2014 Nature Communications TEKT4 germline variations associated with breast cancer resistance to paclitaxel
17272681 2007 Molecular Pharmacology Reversal of stathmin-mediated resistance to paclitaxel and vinblastine in breast carcinoma cells
14508823 2003 Cancer Combined trastuzumab + paclitaxel inhibits ErbB-2-mediated angiogenesis via Akt more effectively than either agent alone

Cytotoxicity

Item Content
Cytotoxicity Classification Conventional cytotoxic (taxane class, microtubule-stabilizing agent)
Myelosuppression Risk Please refer to the package insert warnings and precautions
Emetogenicity Classification Please refer to the package insert warnings and precautions
Monitoring Items Please refer to the package insert warnings and precautions
Handling Protection Please refer to the package insert warnings and precautions

Safety Considerations

Please refer to the package insert for safety information.

Conclusion and Next Steps

Decision: Proceed with Guardrails

Rationale: The evidence base for female breast carcinoma is strong (L1, 50 trials including multiple completed Phase 3 RCTs with N>400, plus 20 supporting publications), but this specific evidence pack has a Blocking data gap on TFDA/Finland package-insert warnings and contraindications (DG001) and a High-severity gap on formal MOA documentation (DG002), and the drug is currently recorded as not marketed in Finland.

To proceed, the following is needed:

  • TFDA/Finland package insert (warnings, contraindications) — required before any S1 safety review can proceed
  • Confirmed DrugBank-sourced mechanism-of-action documentation
  • Confirmation of Finland marketing authorization status (or a pathway/timeline to market entry)
  • Drug interaction (DDI) data, currently returned as "not found"

    Disclaimer

This content is for research purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Clinical validation is required before any clinical application.



Back to top

Copyright © 2026 藥提醒科技有限公司 (yao.care). This report is for research purposes only and does not constitute medical advice.

This site uses Just the Docs, a documentation theme for Jekyll.